Luv dancin’





I make no apologies whatsoever for returning repeatedly throughout the pages of A Story To Tell to the purple genius that is Prince Rogers Nelson. After all, a man with a reputed virtual lifetime’s worth of songs, hidden album projects, videos and god knows what else in his vaults Is surely worthy of our attention every now and then. And that is the thing with Prince, his output is so prodigious that there is just so much to say about him.
And I don’t even count myself to be particularly knowledgeable, certainly when compared to the reams and reams of information that can be unearthed on fan sites across the world wide web. Seriously, the amount that has been written on forgotten bootlegs, rumoured side-projects, lost albums is itself a sight to behold. I came across one the other day which is all about a rumoured song that can only be found in the vaults of the US Library of Congress, a song written but rejected in 1988 for Madonna’s “Like A Prayer” album, entitled “By Alien Means”. Almost worth a trip to DC for. I say almost, but trust me there are plenty of fans who would have made that crazy pilgrimage, and more power to them I say. That is truly dedication. But I wanted to talk briefly here about a song which is one of those that is fully released and available, indeed featuring on 1988’s incredible “Lovesexy” album, but rarely heralded or commented upon.
To me however it epitomises much of what there is to love about Prince, through it’s obvious musical accomplishment, but also the innovation that lies behind it and seeps out of the speakers on each listen. The song in question is the skittering funk of “Dance On”, a tune that continues the social commentary of “Sign O The Times” in terms of its subject matter, but which does so to a syncopation of stunning complexity. For some this jars as an aural experience, the amalgam of a frenetic drum pattern interspersed with some rock guitar licks and a driving bass (indeed the running bass throb sounds remarkably like the source for Q-Tip’s solo stormer “Breathe and Stop” but I am unsure if this is truly the case).
Whatever the case, for me this song does something that perhaps even the master of 80s funk didn’t set out to achieve. Because “Dance On” is a song that packs so much funk per ounce into its tiny body, that it almost transcends the music that it is rooted in. If funk is the groove that gets into your soul and shakes your booty in a primeval sex-swamp, then “Dance On” is a record that is so damn funky it goes over the precipice and takes the funk a step further in evolution, into a place where the usual rules don’t apply. It is a dance record with so much groove you can’t actually dance to it. Now that, my friends, is the true source.
An over the top appraisal you may feel, but it is a point worth making in urging a repeat listen to this tune, and indeed the whole of the “Lovesexy” set, an album which commercially marked a slight downturn for Prince, but which is a stunning collection for all sorts of reasons, some of which we have mentioned, and some we will doubtless return to. For now though, if you can catch the groove, just dance on, dance on*




Now before we start, this posting isn’t meant to be taken to mean anything strange, and there is no hidden meaning in the proposition I am putting forward here. We have spoken before on these pages about the ambiguity that now comes with being a fan of Michael Jackson, the outrageously talented performer whose life has become something of an equally outrageous prolonged freak show and bizarre series of events to say the very least. But I am not here to judge or preach. Many of you will have your own views on the whole crazy world and let’s leave it there.
Regardless, we all know the man created some of the finest pop moments of all time, taking disco, funk, soul and more into uncharted and quite stunning new territories. But rather than focussing on the brilliance of The Jacksons, and the partly simultaneous rise of Jackson as an adult solo star through ”Off The Wall” and beyond, I wanted to pause for a moment and look back to the original introduction of the Jackson 5 as a group of themselves. And particularly I wanted to look at Michael Jackson as lead singer of that outfit, and a distinct element of their output, namely their brilliant ballads. Now we all know about the bubblegum pop sound with which they first burst onto the scene, the genius of “I Want You Back”, “ABC” and “The Love You Save”, and the fact that this heralded a talented group with a super talented lead singer in 12 year old Michael.
But their fourth single, and fourth straight number one hit, flipped the script somewhat with the sensational “Ill Be There”. Here was a 12 year old leading a group of brothers themselves largely still in adolescence, in singing a song of longing, regret and commitment. And killing it. I mean totally killing it. Make no mistake, “I’ll Be There”, released in 1970, is a gem of a pop ballad, and Jackson’s performance is absolutely breath-taking. And do not be fooled either, because this was a risk, and as it turns out, master-stroke from Berry Gordy, and took his Motown disciples to new leagues of possibility in terms of sales and stardom.
And there were others to follow. Standouts include the brilliant “Never Can Say Goodbye”, Jackson's first solo venture with the emotionally-wrenching and beautiful “Got To Be There”, and the Bill Withers cover “Ain’t No Sunshine”, to my mind the funkiest thing Jackson ever did, Seriously, it is brilliant. And these are just the cream of a rich crop. But I was listening to “Never Can Say Goodbye” the other day and it struck me, as I sung along with my own inimitable style, that here is quite an odd phenomenon.
A boy, barely into puberty, singing ballads of great depth and emotion with a conviction that some of the greatest soul singers could never muster. How did he do that, despite surely having never even encountered many of the emotions himself at that stage in his life? I seriously don't know. And then I realised that I can’t think of one other example of an artist who has done this. Not that there have not been child artists to achieve great fame and musical accomplishment, Little Stevie Wonder for one, but to pull off great soul balladeering at such tender years is a phenomenon of sorts, and further evidence of just what a rare talent Jackson was, and perhaps still is. The last questions is moot anyway, but I for one have always thought that these songs are highpoints of an already stellar musical output. And as I say, if you have ever wondered how an already classic song of anguish and love-riddled despair could sound better than it’s brilliant original, then dig out Jackson’s cover of “Ain’t No Sunshine”.
Peep the breakdown at 1min45 and revel in the greatness. Soul music is filled with covers and interpretations, and for me this is one of the essences of the music, the ability to stamp authority on a great piece of work. A great song can make an average singer sound great. A great singer can make an average song great. A great singer can turn a great song into a work of genius. Jackson often had all three.

